Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 15:29:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info Monsoon rain clouds over the Kaveri River, looking upstream towards the evening sun. Doddegaudana Koppalu, Mandya district, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support This image with its contrasting tones epitomises the monsoon as the source of fresh life and cooler weather after the searing dry summer, and simultaneously a source of havoc due to flooding rivers. -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 11:32:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 12:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The head is in good focus, but the body is partly blurred. The legs are obscured by grass. This is a common slow moving species with a large number of images in Commons. --Tagooty (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 10:43:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 10:05:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info Detail of the cloister of D. João I, Monatery of Batalha, Portugal. An attempt at showing beauty under difficult dynamic range and focus conditions. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 09:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Sweden
- Info Lonely harbor crane on the site of the former Götaverken City Shipyards in Gothenburg a beautiful winter day. During the 1930s it was the world's biggest shipyard by launched gross registered tonnage. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The random electric scooter in the foreground sells it for me. There's use here, but not as the shipyard was originally envisioned. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 07:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question – What is attached to the top of its head? —Bruce1eetalk 12:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing is attached, the cheetah is completely wild and free, it's just a piece of dry grass standing on its head, something common with big cats as they like to lay on the ground -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. —Bruce1eetalk 13:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing is attached, the cheetah is completely wild and free, it's just a piece of dry grass standing on its head, something common with big cats as they like to lay on the ground -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 13:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 19:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Curculionidae (Snout Beetles/Weevils)
- Info Phyllobius maculicornis / Created by Alexander Klepnev - uploaded by Alexander Klepnev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Extraordinary level of detail. The light is well handled in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exceptional detail and colour --Tagooty (talk) 15:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 18:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
- Info Astratovolcano located in the eastern part of Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia / Created by Елена Верещака - uploaded by Елена Верещака - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Dust spots virtually everywhere, should be fixed first. --A.Savin 23:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it's the spots and not a natural part of the landscape? I don't see them on the water surface. JukoFF (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- There are at least 18 dust spots, probably more. Most of them are very obvious. Otherwise the wow factor is there, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Dear Reviewers @Елена Верещака, JukoFF, A.Savin, and Basile Morin: Thank you for pointing out the numerous dust spots. I have provided a cleaned up version under the SwissTransfer link, which you are welcome to use for an update or derivative. I hope I got them all :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! File reloaded! JukoFF (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Dear Reviewers @Елена Верещака, JukoFF, A.Savin, and Basile Morin: Thank you for pointing out the numerous dust spots. I have provided a cleaned up version under the SwissTransfer link, which you are welcome to use for an update or derivative. I hope I got them all :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive capture! Thanks for using the edited version. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Now that it's been cleaned. Excellent image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 15:51:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
- Info Eurasian coot (Fulica atra). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wolverine XI 22:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colours and composition with the broken reflection --Tagooty (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 15:43:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
- Info Eastern amberwing (Perithemis tenera). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty good shot. Wolverine XI 03:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding image --Tagooty (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 11:25:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Serbia
- Info Church of Saint Sava, Belgrade. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Info Please those who think buidlings shold be paralel to border skip my nomine...or show me the result. Adobe JPEG.
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Building and sky. Quite a long exposure for a drone picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Basile Morin True, didnt note it before, half second is overdose for handheld shot, but obviosly giroscope works perfect here. --Mile (talk) 08:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 04:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 10:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Bunker called Teufelgraben, then of the Abbiette Fromelles Nord. It differs from other blockhouses by a casemated observatory added on its eastern flank.. Listed as a historic monument of France IA59004858. created by all by me --Pierre André (talk) 10:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André (talk) 10:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but when the subject doesn't have a large amount of inherent "wow" to it (IMO this does not), the photo/conditions need to be really great. The light is the biggest problem in this case. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination @Rhododendrites: Thanks for your advice, best regards --Pierre André (talk) 20:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 08:09:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
- Info Couple of plains zebras (Equus quagga), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating intertwined lines, that evoke me Victor Vasarely's painting Zebras (1937) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 13:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed and exposed, sharp. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Benji 16:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment! --Tagooty (talk) 15:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 07:23:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Astronauts
- Info created by Robert Markowitz for NASA - uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Info This is the second nomination of this picture that features a new upload (higher resolution and sharper). Here is the first nomination.
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Nice quality, impressive, and high EV -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Unique, which excuses (for me) the technical shortcomings. The image has its own stand-alone importance given its virality a few years ago, which gives it some extra oomph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Zzzs (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Woof… I mean, wow! ★ 18:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 21:51:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
- Info Female Lion (Panthera leo) resting on a tree in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Sorry Poco but the focus is on the tail. And this tail is not particularly exciting :-) The head is clearly out of focus. Animal fleeing is also less appealing than an animal approaching. Do you have another version of the same photo session? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Basile Morin: I've sharpened the head, an improvement, I agree. I do have other shots of this session, like this one but in fact I enjoy the pose here and the empty background very much. It did not actually flee, if moved around. Poco a poco (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- The other one is a better candidate in my view. Although the lion is not fleeing, we can't really guess what it's doing and this picture showing a view from behind gives this impression -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, ok, thank for your feedback, let's see what other reviewers mean between both versions Poco a poco (talk) 11:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not really bothered by the fact that the head is not entirely in focus (it's sharp enough in my opinion), but there's no "wow" to me, maybe because the lion looks like he's fleeing. --Benji 16:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 20:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales
- Info Dracaena cinnabari or the Dragonblood tree of Socotra in the Dixam plateau. Created and uploaded by Alex38 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support @Alex38 EXIF is missing. --Mile (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Added, thanks a lot for your support ! Alex38 (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well exposed, great colors with the rusty branches, green "leaves" and the deep blue of the sky. The image also depicts the unique terrain that the dragonblood tree has adapted to growing in. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Maybe a little underexposed in the foreground, but I like being able to look around and see these strange trees dot the landscape at full resolution. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking Henrysz (talk) 16:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree that the foreground is a little underexposed, but overall I think the lighting is handled well. I do think a +10 to shadows would help this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:50:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
- Info created by Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
- Comment 1970-1979 section doesn't exist yet, but it is time to create it. Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
For portrait photographs after from 1970 or later, please use Portraits or Black and White portraits.
- ★ 17:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think we could have sections in Historical up to 2000. Yann (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- We can add a change suggestion. ★ 22:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think we could have sections in Historical up to 2000. Yann (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support great Portrait. --Harald Krichel (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much! Not the most difficult restoration - some dust, but not ridiculous amounts, but I think a valuable one. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Harald Krichel. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support C.S.I --Wilfredor (talk) 02:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:28:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clean composition, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well exposed, composed, sharp detail - this image documents the species extremely well. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 01:27:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info Educational, in my opinion. Luckily, male and female sexual organs are both visible. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sex tape released :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The main downside is the heads of both animals are out of focus. The visible reproductive organs mostly make up for the downside IMO. Now to scrub this off of my search history... --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. Aperture F/10 and time 1 /250 s is the maximum combination I could get here, and only 100 mm focal length. Going closer would have scared the birds. Focus was of course intentional -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I have told people about the corkscrew fallus, this image offers proof. As I understand it, the mallard's has barbs on it. It not a pretty picture, so to speak, but it documents something rarely observed, and the image brings into clear and sharp detail the evolution of a duck's fallus. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, having browsed through the categories, I noticed we have incredibly few images of this type, and even fewer quality images. I totally agree this one will never make a poster for a living room :-) But it's also original and perhaps more educational than a bunch of solitary ducks walking or swimming on a pond. Thank you very much -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting and good documentation but I don't believe this is one of our finest images (in terms of subject, ligthing, detail, compo), sorry, Basile, Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 21:20:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info Formerly the 17th century Governor's Hotel, the Maison du gouverneur is listed as a historic monument of France. Aire-sur-la-Lys, Pas-de-Calais, France. created by all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light and nothing exeptional here. Just a picture of an old building with the good perspective. VI/QI, not FP. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs This building is listed as a historical monument of France, in the urban and landscape architectural heritage protection zone. It is listed in the Mérimée database, a database on French architectural heritage from the Ministry of Culture, under the reference PA00107940. best regards Pierre André (talk) 10:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- In addition, I can see overprocessing on the cornice of the building. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- * I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advice. --Pierre André (talk) 20:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- In addition, I can see overprocessing on the cornice of the building. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs This building is listed as a historical monument of France, in the urban and landscape architectural heritage protection zone. It is listed in the Mérimée database, a database on French architectural heritage from the Ministry of Culture, under the reference PA00107940. best regards Pierre André (talk) 10:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 15:50:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
- Info I know there are several FP of this castle, but this one offers more detail and higher resolution. It’s not necessarily better, just different, and none of the others are from this time of year. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree, you found a good point of view and the resolution/quality is very high. -- Terragio67 (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 11:49:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales
- Info created by Le Commissaire - uploaded by Le Commissaire - nominated by Mickaël en résidence -- Mickaël en résidence (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mickaël en résidence (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Good focus, pleasing aesthetic, and the bees are abuzzing. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 05:25:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info Chah, a small village nestled at the base of a barren mountain range in Zanskar in the Indian Himalayas. Population 465 (2011), elevation 3,920 m (12,860 ft). The large extent of newly-sown green fields in this arid high-altitude semi-desert is a tribute to the ingenuity and perseverance of the farmers. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, and the viewpoint is appreciable -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 02:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC) but why f/18?
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 23:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info created by Gustaw Zemła - photographed/uploaded/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unexceptional light and composition, in my opinion. Dull sky and bland colors. The building in the background and the video camera in the foreground are not really beautiful. Also not convinced this is the best angle for this sculpture, compared to other photos on the internet. Contrast artwork / trees of the same color not working, sorry. Technically there is chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Cropped videocamera on foreground and improve lightning Ezarateesteban 17:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I tried to photograph this monument a couple times during Wikimania, too, and found it surprisingly difficult (light, but also background/composition). I didn't wind up uploading any of them. Maybe better with a wide angle lens... — Rhododendrites talk | 16:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 20:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info Riesenburg (Giants castle) Cave in Franconian Switzerland, Germany. Looking vertically upwards through the collapsed ceiling. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love this view. Wolverine XI 20:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support This place scares me --Wilfredor (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great view, and looks good at small scale, but I find oversharpened trees unpleasant to look at at full resolution. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 17:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info A fisherman at Muzhappilangad beach.
All by Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support POTY 2024 finalist. ★ 17:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Outstanding scene. But the sky shows colour banding and I am not happy with the fact that this nomination is giving no EXIF data about the camera used and is only provided at 9.8 megapixels. --August (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Everything is fixed. Now please consider --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- August, By considering your suggestions I have made some changes. Is it OK? --Shagil Kannur (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Thank you for editing! The image was improved slightly. It has some more detail and proper EXIF data now. But the colour banding is still visible in the form a pixelated parts at the sky. Additionally it is cropped intensively from 21 megapixels down to 11.6 megapixels. So all in all I really love the scene with its composition and light, but technicaly this image might have trouble even becoming Quality Image so I can sadly not consider it FP.
- August (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- August, By considering your suggestions I have made some changes. Is it OK? --Shagil Kannur (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Everything is fixed. Now please consider --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Benji 16:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 08:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Hans Holbein the Younger, uploaded by Shonagon, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning reproduction of an excellent portrait painting representative for its time. I have never seen Holbein’s the Younger brushwork in such detail. – Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high quality for a 6400 ISO. – Terragio67 (talk) 19:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Huge resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 15:16:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Nepali grandmother preparing food in a traditional kitchen. Created by Mithun Kunwar, edited and uploaded by Radomianin, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The original photograph was one of my personal favourites from Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 – it feels so authentic and is aesthetically very appealing because of the contrasts between light and dark and between warm and cold colours. But the original file was a bit noisy and oversaturated. Radomianin has generously created this edited version which greatly reduces the noise and also tones down the saturation a bit. (Yes, the reds are still very saturated, but IMHO realistic when we consider the combination of the vivid red paint on the wall with the warm light from the fire.) Therefore I am happy to nominate this edited version. – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great atmospheric image, thank you for your careful editing, Radomianin! --Kritzolina (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive composition and color scheme; thanks for the nomination, Aristeas. When compared to the original, the difference in saturation is obvious. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Very striking environment with fantastic candle lights. Appealing composition (like this one by the same author) with living subject, and excellent quality considering the low light intensity. 6 second shot, wow! Warm and beautiful -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice work. Looks better if the top cropped a little imo. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 19:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Evocative colours. Remarkable clarity for a 6 sec exposure. --Tagooty (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nothing much to say. Wolverine XI 15:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 04:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 14:23:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info The Culemborg rail bridge in 1868, just after being completed. It was the longest of its kind in that era. This photo from the inner side features a great perspective, a modern-looking atmosphere, yet the people in the middle reminds us that is still full XIX century | Photo from the National Archives of the Netherlands, originally uploaded by Mr.Nostalgic - cropped and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 16:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Historically valuable and an eye-catching composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 19:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good use of perspective. --Tagooty (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 13:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info Medina of Fes (= old, enwalled town of Fes), Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too busy, nothing stands out. A possible VI candidate. --Tagooty (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 06:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the image, the composition, exposure and the glorious gold colors juxtaposed with the red. I think the "wow" factor exceeds the complications of the long exposure. Some of the monk's heads show motion blur, and one is transparent. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. As many pictures were taken that day on a tripod, I could improve this effect with another frame. Side note: the image notes (gadget) should be placed on the nomination page, not on the file page, per Commons:Image annotations#Examples of inappropriate and not-informative notes. Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I didn't realize that I ended up on the wrong page with that. Its a great shot! Glad you had another frame. The depth, the color, its like peering into a secret world. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. As many pictures were taken that day on a tripod, I could improve this effect with another frame. Side note: the image notes (gadget) should be placed on the nomination page, not on the file page, per Commons:Image annotations#Examples of inappropriate and not-informative notes. Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I also like the slight asymmetry created by the door leaves opening to different widths and by the gathered curtains. Somehow they make the image livelier and more exciting – it is not a static view, but we seem to get an unexpected view into the life of the monks. – Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas; quite an image --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support There's still one head with significant motion blur, but overall this is excellent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Chris Woodrich.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 02:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta
- Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop on left could be more wider for some px. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- I took your advice and went back to the original and re-cropped it and uploaded a new version. I think I may have done this wrong. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's disconcerting to merge the background with the silhouette of the bird, it's not something we should be electing. Although the dynamics of the flight is perfectly conveyed, but the quality of the photo is not very good. JukoFF (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Just trying to understand what you mean -- are you saying there's not enough separation between the bird and the background? — Rhododendrites talk | 16:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail. Very sharp for a bird frozen in flight. Difficult shot. Impressive aerodynamic position at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per JukoFF. --August (talk) 08:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per JukoFF. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:52:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info created and uploaded by Lebobito - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice sunset image but IMHO not sufficiently impressive or unique enough to be FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:41:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 00:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 10:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I really appreciate the straightforward composition and the atmosphere created by the lighting. However, the absence of any direct light results in a very low contrast between the foreground and the building. Just a touch of direct light on the water fountains would have helped to create separation and add depth. Additionally, I find the tightly cropped building on the far left somewhat distracting. --August (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Alt version
- Info Thanks to @Augustgeyler: for the review, I found it valid, and IMHO this version is better. I removed the building cut and I add more contrast --Wilfredor (talk) 21:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good also. Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Vulcan prefers this alt version.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Prefer ALT — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Alt version 2
- Info I apologize for pinging so many people, but I'm pinging those who have previously voted because I consider this version superior, the people capture the real atmosphere of the place. In addition to a distortion-free front view. @Yann, UnpetitproleX, JukoFF, El Golli Mohamed, Agnes Monkelbaan, MZaplotnik, SHB2000, Augustgeyler, VulcanSphere, George Chernilevsky, and Crisco 1492: --Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this version --Wilfredor (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is the best for me. --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 19:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
- Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are no FP's of this species. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is nowhere near FP-level. I suggest you withdraw this nomination. Wolverine XI 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Constructive criticism will assist me in nominating high quality images and in capturing better photographs. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- It has been six days since you stated you would provide more information about your objection to this photo as an FP. You haven't provided any specific concerns about the image, but your statement in opposition is very strongly stated. Your opposition is currently the only one for this nomination. If you are unwilling to elaborate, could you please withdraw your opposition? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I strongly disagree. --Zzzs (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. I'll forgive you. However, I'll suggest to include a reason in your oppose votes so the author can use thr criticism to fix the image. Thanks in advance! Zzzs (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It looks tilted, otherwise fine to me. More information about the location would be good, too. Poco a poco (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting capture, really good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
OpposeTalking about quality, it is very good. For FP - background failed you here, black on black, i can see upper part of bird since its covered. At least some white middle-bellow helped. Also, i hope you wont use 100+ MB for each photo, its around 24 MPx, do we loose so much on jpeg !? --Mile (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)- I see what you are saying. I did shoot at f/4 (Prime lens at 500mm without TC) to focus on the eyes and face of the adult ibis and the exchange of food. As for the PNG, I did a quick check and it seems like I'm the only dork using it. I use PNG for lossless compression, preservation of image quality and colors. Wikipedia's suggestion is JPG, so moving forward I will post JPGs. But my previously uploaded images, already uploaded, may appear on FPC as .PNG.
- Thank you for your thoughtful and considerate feedback. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, now leave as PNG, if you put jpeg over it will take another space so OK now. I will actually remove minus, to neutral. Checked again. --Mile (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 17:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Little bit of an odd image for here: I'd say it's oddly composed but very compelling. Passed En-wiki FPC easily, but Commons evaluates things differently. Vote as you see fit; I shan't take offense, but I would appreciate explanations, because, y'know, there's other images to consider, and having a good idea on how Commons stands helps with pre-filtering them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive illustration of Pentecostal faith/superstition (depending on your own point of view). – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support For those not in the US, yes, this is actually a thing. In the early 19th century we were not as church-going as we are these days. Charismatic priests traveled from the cities to rural areas and started a variety of high-energy, exciting sects/movements. Those in turn gave way to another "awakening" that began to incorporate things like speaking in tongues, drinking poison, fire walking, faith healing, and yes, handling venomous snakes. It's dangerous garbage that actually hurts people. Worth a feature for good documentation, even if I'd rather it show one of the snake bites -- or the people in the audience with mangled hands and missing body parts (or missing family members). — Rhododendrites talk | 16:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 20:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 14:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
- Info created by Rangan Datta Wiki - uploaded by Rangan Datta Wiki - nominated by Rangan Datta Wiki -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Probably the best possible view of this impressive 1906/1907 building (for some details, see e.g. this article). I like the contrast between the ambitious Indo Saracenic building and the modern Kolkata in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support But the file name could be better and the description is very poor of the --Llez (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The building is nice, but it's partially obscured behind the trees. The level of detail and the lighting are not good Poco a poco (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Clingmans Dome Road in snow 06 April 2024 01.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 06:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States (this gallery has sections for states, but there is currently none for the state in which this image was taken: North Carolina)
- Info created by AHeneen - uploaded by AHeneen - nominated by AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support as creator & nominator. There is a lot of detail in this image, but when viewed at 100% zoom, the sharpness should be OK. In my browser, the "original image" link on its page defaults to a much higher zoom (200%???) in which the sharpness of the trees is not the greatest. The rock face on the left foreground is naturally wet year-round and had a trickle of running water behind a layer of ice, which is why some of the ice against the rock face is dark while icicles hanging close to the rock face are bright from the sunlight shining through them. Image was taken in Nikon RAW format and only editing adjustments were to increase both highlight and shadow protection, increase overall brightness just a little, increase saturation just a little, and change white balance from "auto" to "natural light auto". -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really good composition. The sharpness could be better (f/8?) and a touch of CAs. --XRay 💬 11:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, light, and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Very good composition. But I think it is over-sharpened. Is this intentional? --August (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- It depends on your camera settings and your software when editing. Sharpening can be applied in both stages. August (talk) 22:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral A tad oversharpened. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily over-sharpened. --August (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty but not outstanding, it is also overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unexceptional, sorry. Just a normal road in my view. Something special is missing, like a horse or colorful flowers -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 21 Aug → Mon 26 Aug Thu 22 Aug → Tue 27 Aug Fri 23 Aug → Wed 28 Aug Sat 24 Aug → Thu 29 Aug Sun 25 Aug → Fri 30 Aug Mon 26 Aug → Sat 31 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 17 Aug → Mon 26 Aug Sun 18 Aug → Tue 27 Aug Mon 19 Aug → Wed 28 Aug Tue 20 Aug → Thu 29 Aug Wed 21 Aug → Fri 30 Aug Thu 22 Aug → Sat 31 Aug Fri 23 Aug → Sun 01 Sep Sat 24 Aug → Mon 02 Sep Sun 25 Aug → Tue 03 Sep Mon 26 Aug → Wed 04 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.